MES/MNQ micro futures, referenced against CME product specs for contract size and tick structure.
CME MES specsCME MNQ specsFade Pulse Research
A faster failed-auction branch with useful trade frequency and a cleaner drawdown profile than the broad failed-auction set.
Target/RR Profile
~1.25R target profile. failed-auction branch target. The displayed RR is the modeled take-profit multiple from the research artifacts; live fills can vary with slippage, fees, and platform execution.
Research read
- A better fast-candidate shelf item than the raw broad failed-auction module.
- Monte Carlo p05 remained positive in the historical bootstrap.
- Still needs forward-paper parity before it becomes an automation candidate.
Public risk evidence
How to read the prop-firm numbers
The PDF turns the strategy stats into a modeled eval-style plan: risk per trade, historical max drawdown in R, Monte Carlo stress drawdown, pass/fail windows, and a forward-test checklist. Free C-tier pages are published as learning research; B/A-tier pages keep exact locked rules private.
PineScript chart proof
LuxAlgo Quant AI baseline compiled in TradingView Pine Editor on the CME_MINI:ES1! chart. The public page shows the compiled chart preview; Pine delivery is kept out of public_html so the site does not leak scripts accidentally.
Audit trail
This dashboard is a public summary of local historical replay output. The visible stats are generated from closed-trade artifacts; exact rules, raw files, and code are only exposed when the strategy is free/unlocked.
Historical replay artifacts were built from local ATAS/Databento research exports and Databento historical-data pulls where available.
Databento Historical APIStats use R-multiple closed trades, equity-curve reconstruction, Monte Carlo bootstrap paths, and modeled prop-style pass/fail stress tests where enough sample exists.
Not live audited. Results can change with fees, slippage, missed fills, latency, contract rolls, prop-rule changes, or market regime shifts.
Risk note
Strategy research is educational software and trading research, not financial advice. Backtests and simulations can fail in live markets because of fees, slippage, latency, platform behavior, regime changes, and user execution.